Abstract:
In Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL),
one can express statements about the strategic
ability of an agent (or a coalition of
agents) to achieve a goal g such as: “agent
i can choose a strategy such that, if i follows
this strategy then, no matter what other
agents do, g will always be true”. However,
strategies in ATL are revocable in the
sense that in the evaluation of the goal g the
agent i is no longer restricted by the strategy
she has chosen in order to reach the state
where the goal is evaluated. In this paper
we consider alternative variants of ATL where
strategies, on the contrary, are irrevocable.
The difference between revocable and irrevocable
strategies shows up when we consider
the ability to achieve a goal which, again,
involves (nested) strategic ability. Furthermore,
unlike in the standard semantics of
ATL, memory plays an essential role in the
semantics based on irrevocable strategies.
Computational Intelligence Group @ Technical University of Clausthal | |
Human Media Interaction Group @ University of Twente | |
Computer Science Group @ University of Gdansk | Last modified 2007-05-22 |